Skip to Content

We want the curriculum to be co-taught by a male and a female, but we can't find any male volunteers. What should we do?

A situation like this poses a dilemma for a congregation. On the one hand, it is important for the program to be led by people who are qualified, capable, and appropriate. On the other hand, it is important for the program's leadership to represent different gender experiences and provide different gender role models for participants. Sometimes it can take a real effort to find a male co-leader for the program because fewer males than females participate in religious education and sexuality education. Being proactive—speaking directly with people who you think would be good leaders—frequently yields results. If after a real effort the dilemma remains, it is ultimately up to the program's coordinators (usually the religious education committee and the religious education director) to decide whether it is in the best interest of participants to run the program with leaders of only one gender. (Co-leadership is still crucial). Another option is to postpone the program until a year when both male and female leaders can be found. For some, partnering with another congregation is an option that has several benefits.

Last updated on Monday, June 4, 2007.

Related Content

Main Navigation

Section Navigation

Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations | 25 Beacon Street | Boston, MA 02108 | (617) 742-2100 | info @ uua.org

© Copyright 1996 - 2008 Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations. All Rights Reserved.

Created by Matrix Group International, Inc. ®