| |
 |
| |
Dan Harper
|
Monday June 24
Yesterday night, I got on the bus at about 11 p.m. to head back to
Laval University, 3 miles away, where I am staying. When I got on the
street, there was a strange electric feeling in the air. A large group
of people stood at the bus stop, but when the bus came few of them got
on. From the bus windows, I could see people standing along the street,
some waving the blue-and-white Québec flag. I had a safe ride
back, but couldn't figure out what it was all about.
Today, though I'm not a morning person, I got up in time for an 8:30
a.m. workshop on campus ministry. It was led by Joseph Lyons and Jesse
Jaeger. Excerpts from my notes: "Lyons asked, what are current
things going on in your congregation that can serve students? -- last
year's study action plan on economic justice has already attracted college
students to one church -- in another church, students are involved in
gay/lesbian/bi/transgender group -- someone from a california church:
they have Spanish worship service, give Spanish-speaking students who
are homesick a place to feel at home." Hearing about keeping college
students involved in Unitarian Universalism was a great way to start
the morning.
I co-led a workshop with Devin Krugman, a youth, on youth empowerment.
We had a blast. I loved hearing how people are making youth empowerment
happen in their congregations. We ran into one problem, though. We had
everyone sit in a circle so we wouldn't be these disembodied voices
coming from somewhere behind a lectern. But presentations at General
Assembly are taped. When we sat in a circle and didn't use the microphone
at the lectern, they couldn't record the workshop. For better or worse,
Devin and I came down on the side of emphasizing the experience of the
people that we were face-to-face with. But it's an open question --
is General Assembly information shared and business transacted with
all Unitarian Universalists, or is General Assembly the people who are
actually present?
Devin solved the mystery of last night for me. Apparently, today is
"Québec Day," a celebration of Québec nationality
and identity. That's why people were out on the streets when I was on
my way home. Devin said last night proved troublesome for the youth
at General Assembly. Many youth are staying at a youth hostel a few
blocks from the convention center, and they were uncomfortable walking
home late last night. Devin told me the youth worked with adult allies
to arrange an escort system.
As I walked to lunch with my friends Rosie, Lee, and Ann, we found
many restaurants were closed because of the holiday. I noticed quite
a few young men with blue-and-white fleur-de-lys painted on their faces.
My lunch buddies told me that a few years ago Québec Day erupted
in political demonstrations against globalization. Another reminder
of how different Canada and the United States are. I cannot imagine
anyone painting the Massachusetts state flag on their foreheads on our
Patriots Day and rioting to protest globalization.
On the long drive home, I had time to reflect on General Assembly.
It feels as though the vote for the separation of the Canadian Unitarian
Council (CUC) and the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) is the
biggest institutional event for us since the consolidation of the Unitarians
and the Universalists in 1961. I'm sad that our Canadian friends separated
from the UUA. But Canada is indeed a foreign country, and I can understand
the need for an independent CUC.
Sunday June 23
If you're like me, you like to go to worship services on Sunday mornings. I
love Sunday morning at General Assembly, because that's the time of the main worship
service, the Service of the Living Tradition, where we worship together and honor
our professional ministry.
I watched with interest as the new ministers walked up and were recognized
in the worship service. I knew a couple of these new ministers, and knowing their
stories made the service more powerful. One woman, for example, is a single mom
who began preparing for the ministry nearly a decade ago. She has raised her child,
worked (often full-time), and studied, and finally she has finished. I'm a New
England Yankee which means I'm not much of a hand at showing emotions, but that
kind of dedication to an ideal is enough to bring even me to tears.
Just in front of me sat a father with his 13- or 14-year-old daughter. During
the offertory, she lay down across two chairs to take a nap with her head on her
dad's knee, a girl poised between childhood and adulthood. I like a father who
helps his daughter come to worship services, even ones she may not be interested
in. It reminds me of my own mother, an old-school Unitarian who went to the nearest
Unitarian church whether or not she liked the minister because she knew in her
bones that being a part of a religious community means that sometimes you do things
that are boring, or even hard or unpleasant. Though taking a nap with your head
on your dad's knee doesn't sound all that bad to me.
One very good little girl, about 6, sat several rows in front of me. She was
with what appeared to be her extended family. During Barbara Pescan's sermon,
this little girl sat on the floor in front of her chair, playing quietly between
her mother's and grandmother's feet. I thought about what it is that little children
really see in worship services. They can't see the minister, all they can see
is people's backs and people's feet. OK, I admit it, I didn't pay as much attention
as I should have done to Barbara Pescan's sermon on the importance of ministry,
and it was a good one, too, with wonderful stories and examples of ministry in
action.
During the plenary session today, the delegates were asked to vote on whether
or not to concur to the Canadian Unitarian Council's (CUC) request to separate
from the Unitarian Universalist Association. One speaker in favor of the motion
asked us to see it not as a separation, but as a step towards creating a new kind
of relationship. A young adult, a Canadian, acknowledged that separation was pretty
much a fait accompli, but he still spoke against separation saying, "My community
has been shattered, my heart has been broken." Then a vote was called by
moderator Diane Olson, and an overwhelming majority of delegates voted in favor
of separation.
I'm with the young Canadian. Separation hurts. The last person to speak before
the vote suggested that we plan to have joint UUA and CUC meetings every five
or ten years. If I hold on to that hope, the separation doesn't hurt as much.
I like plenary sessions even when the votes don't turn out the way I might
hope. They're not just business meetings, they provide great people watching.
(Hint: never sit at the front of a plenary session, always sit back where you
can watch other people.) I love watching personalities unfold and interact with
each other. You sit there and people drift in and out of the hall, emotions rise
and fall, votes are taken and reports are heard, in a slow, comfortable rhythm.
They aren't just meetings, they are ongoing dramas where we get a new installment
each year.
I had dinner with Mellen. We're both in our early 40's, we have both worked
as religious educators, and we're both preparing for ministry. We went to a cafe
a block from the convention center, and there we plotted the change and transformation
of Unitarian Universalism into a religious movement that will be fully welcoming
to children and youth, people of color, people of any economic class, people who
-- well, we will be fully welcoming to just about everyone. It was a very satisfying
discussion. Maybe someday our dream will come true.
Actually, knowing Mellen and some others like her, one day it will come true.
Saturday June 22, 2002
In my experience, Saturday is the crazy day of General Assembly. It's the halfway
point, you can faintly sense the end is coming. Today I think tried to do way
too much.
I spent a good part of the morning in the webworker's hideout on the second floor
of the Hilton Hotel next door to the convention center. I had some writing to
catch up on, but I also ran into networking problems. It was a somewhat trying
morning, but at the same time I like hanging out with other webworkers.
As the morning plenary session let out, I ran into quite a few people I knew.
I heard some strong and varied reactions to the vote on the Statement of Conscience
supporting legalization of all drugs. We Unitarian Universalists do not operate
by consensus. When we take a vote, that rarely means that the discussion is over.
Erik said that while he voted for the statement of conscience, he didn't entirely
agree with it, but he didn't want it to just disappear for another year. Another
friend said that he did not agree with the statement because it "isn't nuanced
enough, it's too simplistic," and for him the strength of Unitarian Universalism
is that it can take on complex issues in all their complexity.
As for me, while I am not a voting delegate this year, I find I can't support
a statement of conscience promoting full drug legalization. I don't agree with
the United States drug policy, but I feel full legalization doesn't take into
account the needs of children and youth. Most of all, I would prefer that the
General Assembly not focus so narrowly on United States political issues, feeling
we should have a more international understanding.
Someone has said that wherever you have three Unitarian Universalists, you will
find five or six opinions on any given topic. There was some truth to that today
right after the vote on the statement of conscience.
I had a delightful lunch with Chris. We walked quite a way down Rue St. Jean,
beyond where most of the GA folks were, and found a quiet cafe where we were the
only anglophones. Our conversation ranged from the virulent racism of Boston to
what makes a good children's story.
The afternoon is now something of a blur to me. I know I went to hear Carole Fontaine
speak on the relationship of human rights to the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament,
and the Koran. Dr. Fontaine is a wonderfully witty lecturer, but beyond the sheer
entertainment value of her lecture I enjoyed the absolute clarity and depth of
her thinking on the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim scriptures. I'd have to say
it was the best lecture I've ever heard at GA. (Hint to the GA Planning Committee:
ask Carole Fontaine to speak at next year's GA.)
I clearly remember attending the bridging ceremony, where youth "bridge"
into young adulthood. I was in tears when I saw Meredith, whom I've known since
she was 12, walked across that stage into young adulthood. You can read more about
the bridging ceremony in the article I wrote for this website.
I remember those two things. But I know much else happened that I either don't
remember, or have gotten mixed up with events of the past few days. For example,
where did I eat dinner, and with whom? That workshop where I was a member of the
panel -- was that today? Was it today that I talked with Keith? or with Jo?
I'm not sure I can remember. Craziness and exhaustion are setting in. Earlier
today, I do remember hearing someone say, "I'm going home, I'm just so tired
out." I better watch out that doesn't happen to me. I think I'll go catch
the bus out to Laval University quick, before I fall asleep here in the webworker's
room.
Friday June 21, 2002
The fast pace of General Assembly finally caught up with me this morning.
I didn't get back to my room until midnight last night, so I overslept.
I didn't get to the conference center until ten o'clock.
As I sat in the snack bar of the conference center, drinking coffee
and looking out over an old stone church, my friend Jo walked up. We
filled each other in on our personal lives, but inevitably the conversation
turned to Unitarian Universalism. Jo is on the steering committee for
the Continental Unitarian Universalists Young Adult Network (C*UUYAN),
and she told me about the strategic plan they're working on, and their
efforts to build connections with youth and UUs of color. Suddenly she
looked at her watch and said, "I've got to go. I'm supposed to
meet some people at 11, but I don't know where I'm supposed to meet
them."
Next I ran into Michael, a friend and fellow religious educator. We
had lunch together, and while we didn't exactly talk shop, it was good
to talk with one of the few other men who is a UU religious educator.
Over the years, we have faced many of the same issues.
In the afternoon, I attended the Church of the Larger Fellowship (CLF)
worship service. I've been a CLF member for a couple of years now. CLF
mostly serves isolated Unitarian Universalists, people who don't live
near a Unitarian Universalist congregation. But CLF also serves as a
second congregation for many ministers and religious educators -- people
like me.
CLF minister Jane Rzepka preached on the isolation that religious liberals
can sometimes feel. Religious liberals, Jane said, can sometimes feel
like strangers in the places they live, because many of their friends
and neighbors may not understand their liberal religious perspective.
But we can reach out to each other, build our connections with each
other. Ultimately, Jane pointed out, this process can lead to lessening
the barriers to understanding and acceptance that lie between all people.
I feel this is part of what happens at GA. I reconnect with other religious
liberals, and remember once again that the ultimate goal is to connect
with all sentient beings.
Not only do you connect with people at GA, you also connect with ideas.
In the evening, I ran into my friend Gail. She had been to the workshop
on religious education programs for boys. Most congregations have fewer
boys than girls in Sunday school -- what to do? You can get more men
to teach Sunday school, do hands-on activities, ask the boys themselves
what might induce them to come to church. (I remember talking to Max
Moss, formerly minister at the UU congregation in Auckland, New Zealand,
about this issue. He built a model railroad in the church, and kept
a TV in church when major sports events were on.) But Gail and I agreed
that a key part of the solution is to get the boys' fathers to come
to church.
I know that General Assembly is primarily a business meeting where
we transact the business of the Association. I know that the most important
meetings at GA are the plenary sessions, and I still can't get used
to the idea that there are now some workshops scheduled during plenary
sessions. But hearing from Jo about C*UUYAN's new projects, talking
with Michael about religious education, discussing boys and church with
Gail -- all these things are as important to me personally as the business
sessions are to the Association.
Thursday, 20 June 2002
I spent the morning and the afternoon today getting trained to be a
"Good Offices" representative for my professional organization,
the Liberal Religious Educators Association (LREDA). Other LREDA members
can call on Good Offices representatives for help with conflict management
or for pastoral care. The training was tiring.
A little after four, I met some friends in the lobby of the Hilton,
the hotel right next to the convention center. Rebecca said, "Let's
go to the Mass Bay District Ingathering." Steve and I went along.
But by the time we walked across to the convention center and found
the room where the ingathering was to be held, it was over. At GA, the
best intentions can be defeated by logistical realities.
I went off to a meeting for those of us volunteering as webworkers.
Before I knew it, it was time for the opening ceremony. I met up with
most of the delegates from First Parish in Lexington, Massachusetts,
the congregation I serve as Director of Religious Education. This time
we got the logistics right, and we were first in line when they opened
the doors for the opening ceremonies. We got seats right up near the
front.
We had good people-watching while we were waiting for everything to
begin. As Sally said, "It's so cool watching people greet each
other after a long time apart!" We tried to make generalizations
about the people we saw. Kathy pointed out that there were a lot of
people wearing Birkenstocks, but we also saw everything from wingtips
to hiking boots. There is more diversity among us UUs than we sometimes
admit.
The Rev. Kathleen McTigue began the opening ceremony by reminding us
of the momentous world events since the last General Assembly, and invited
us into a moment of silence for September 11 and its aftermath. Sitting
in silence with thousands of people is a powerful experience, and I
was moved almost to tears. I could hear a baby crying in the back of
the hall, a sound that seemed somehow appropriate.
Half a dozen children and youth ranging in age from about 5 to 16 helped
light a flaming chalice. They remained on stage while Raymond Gros Louis,
representing the local First Nation (or Native American) people, came
forward to bless the beginning of GA. I liked that he mostly faced the
children and youth who had done the chalice lighting. (Note to self:
in public ceremonies, remember to face the children.)
While the banner parade began, I thought about children and religion.
Some banner carriers were families with children. There were three children
in the group I was sitting with, and indeed one family with three generations
represented, from Pieter and Adrian (at 4 and 7), through Erik and Elisabeth,
to Frank and Tina. Watching the banners from congregations across North
America, I thought about how many children they represented. I feel
religion that doesn't include children is empty. I like having children
at GA.
Such beautiful banners we saw! I was sitting next to Sally, who is
a quilter and an excellent seamstress, and she drew my attention to
how well-made some of the banners are. As the last banners passed by
us, Rod said, "It's an amazing sight, isn't it?" It is indeed.
Wednesday, 19 June 2002
If you drive to Québec City from the south, you have to cross the St.
Lawrence River. It is an impressive river, spanned by two huge bridges, one for
the highway and one for the railroad. The river flows between fairly high bluffs
on either side, and you feel a certain magic as you begin to cross the bridge
towards the gently lit city on the other side. The grandeur of the broad river
far below, glinting in the sun, makes the arrival all the more magical.
As I headed towards the center of the city, I passed by comfortable
houses, stone churches, and the occasional modern building, down the
broad tree-lined boulevards to the edge of the Old City and the convention
center where General Assembly will begin tomorrow.
I arrived a day early to participate in "Center Day," the
annual continuing education program for ministers and religious educators.
This is my eighth year as a religious educator, but this is the first
time I have managed to make it to one of these programs. This year we
learned about managing identity-based conflict. Identity-based conflict
can be as deadly as the Israel-Palestine conflicts (and in fact, the
two presenters have worked on conflict resolution in the Middle East),
or as close to home as battles between humanists and pagans, or those
who do, and those who do not, want to include joys and concerns in the
worship service.
Just as important as the continuing education was the chance to see
old friends and colleagues. I tried to catch up on all the news. One
friend and colleague who had moved from Massachusetts to serve a distant
congregation is now pregnant; another friend is still looking for a
position as an interim minister. Phone calls and email help me stay
in touch, but the chance to see and talk with someone face-to-face is
not to be missed.
But I still haven't spent any time exploring Québec City. Maybe
I'll go do that before it gets dark.
Reporter
Dan Harper; Web Designer Julie Albanese & Anna Belle Leiserson